Comment on Presidential Intelligence
Steve Slick | Jan 13, 2016
Responding to recommendations put forward by NYU Law School Professor Samuel Rascoff in Presidential Intelligence, Slick argued that existing mechanisms for review and approval of high-risk intelligence collection activities are fully adequate (when they are energetically exercised) and that adding more presidential appointees to the Intelligence Community would decrease effectiveness while significantly increasing the risk of “politicized” intelligence.
Click here to read the entire article.